Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 10.11.2024 11:20, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-11-09 21:30:47 +0000, WM said:
 

On 09.11.2024 15:03, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-11-08 16:30:23 +0000, WM said:

>

>
If Cantors enumeration of the rationals is complete, then all rationals
are in the sequence 1/1, 1/2, 2/1, 1/3, 2/2, 3/1, 1/4, 2/3, 3/2, 4/1, 1/5, 2/4, 3/3, 4/2, 5/1, 1/6, 2/5, 3/4, 4/3, 5/2, 6/1,  ... and none is outside.

>
All positive rationals quite obviously are in the sequence. Non-positive
rationals are not.
>

Therefore also irrational numbers cannot be there.

>
That is equally obvious.
>

Of course this is wrong.

>
You may call it wrong but that's the way they are.

>
The measure of all intervals J(n) = [n - √2/10, n + √2/10] is smaller than 3.

 Maybe, maybe not, depending on what is all n.

It is, as usual, all natural numbers.

If all n is all reals then
the measure of their union is infinite.

But n is all reals as you could have found out yourself, by the measure < 3.
Regards, WM