Re: they shoot themselves into the foot (Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Re: they shoot themselves into the foot (Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow)
De : janburse (at) *nospam* fastmail.fm (Mild Shock)
Groupes : sci.logic
Date : 15. Nov 2024, 16:57:22
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <vh7r11$7gs4$1@solani.org>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
Hi,
I personally like that ChatGPT tolerates all my
sloppiness, since I am always in a hurry, don't
have time for some bullshit.
And I pay the bill by myself, if ChatGPT doesn't
understand me. I don't need some moderator to
force some ideal into my throat, anyway
most of the time ChatGPT understands me
nevertheless. Has probably to do how
the artificial intelligenc of ChatGPT works:
Attention Is All You Need
https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762
But stack overflow gets also drained by other
developments like for example:
- Thousends of tutorial web sites:
   There is a real cottage industry, of
   commercial web sites, that explain you
   web programming etc.. They are commercial
   since they show banner ads.
- Thousends of tutorial videos:
   There is a similar cottage industry
   for videos. Also commercial because
   the show ads. Even google search
   doesn't show stack overflow as first
   result anymore.
- Declining Business Model Job Search
   With "low code", the number of programmer
   jobs as we know it will go down. A website
   specialized on job advertising will automatically
   loose revenue:
https://stackoverflow.co/advertising/
Bye
Mild Shock schrieb:
Hi,
 Yes exactly, they shoot themselves into the foot.
They adopted the academic closed world attitute,
as can be seen here, not noticing that the John
 Doe programmers are not necessarily a theoretical
computer science titanic A-class member:
 As an example, consider this question – invented, but not far-fetched:
"Random keeps giving me the same numbers. Is it broken?"
This is a low-quality question, in my view.
https://codeblog.jonskeet.uk/2018/03/17/stack-overflow-culture/
 Now try the same with ChatGPT:
 Q: Random keeps giving me the same numbers. Is it broken?
 A: It sounds like your Random object might not be
re-seeded, which could cause it to generate the same
sequence of numbers every time you run your program.
By default, Random is seeded with the current time in
  milliseconds, but if you create it multiple times in
quick succession, it might receive the same seed and
generate the same numbers.
 Bye
 Mild Shock schrieb:
Hi,
>
The cest pool of bit rot is finally gone:
>
(Bit rot, because they did everything in a
facist way ignoring your copyright to prevent
you from deleting you own out dated stuff)
>
CoincidenceIDontThinkSo
https://9gag.com/gag/abAG4oE
>
The Fall of Stack Overflow
https://observablehq.com/@ayhanfuat/the-fall-of-stack-overflow
>
The downfall is related to the appearance of
ChatGPT. I feel pitty for Ulrich Neumerkel false
and others who spammed stackoverflow for years
>
with their infinite dif/2 nonsense.
>
Bye
 

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Nov 24 * Good Bye Stack-Overflow9Mild Shock
15 Nov 24 +* Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow4Mild Shock
15 Nov 24 i`* Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow3Mild Shock
15 Nov 24 i `* Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow2Mild Shock
15 Nov 24 i  `- Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow1Julio Di Egidio
15 Nov 24 `* they shoot themselves into the foot (Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow)4Mild Shock
15 Nov 24  `* Re: they shoot themselves into the foot (Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow)3Mild Shock
15 Nov 24   `* Re: they shoot themselves into the foot (Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow)2Mild Shock
15 Nov 24    `- Re: they shoot themselves into the foot (Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow)1Mild Shock

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal