Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.logicDate : 26. Nov 2024, 18:04:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vi4v3i$3hg8t$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 26.11.2024 15:50, Richard Damon wrote:
It defines the set but not its individual elements.
Sure it does. What number exists that it can not define?
It cannot define numbers of the second half of ℕ.
Regards, WM