Sujet : Re: It seems very doubtful that I will live three more months (models of Omega)
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.logicDate : 30. Nov 2024, 23:02:16
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <5B6cnSMkqZ_0Ftb6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 11/30/2024 12:42 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
>
I always thought the halte problem will come
to a halt around friday the 13th.
>
olcott schrieb:
>
Surgery is the only option that is quick enough.
It looks like it will begin to have severe consequences
in about two weeks: 2024-12-13. Friday the 13th
>
>
There are non-standard models of integers,
so there are complete approximations of halts(),
and some models where P(halts()) = 0.5,
others 1 or 0.
In some theories, like a the one theory,
there isn't even a standard model of integers,
only fragments and extensions, those working
just fine for unboundedness and being infinite.
Of course Aristotle at some point said
"yeah you know there really is an actual infinite, ...."
So anyways Church-Rice and Church-Rosser and
Entscheidungs have various models where
they're not so.
Then what you're looking at is a usual
model of bounded means.
Your numerology and triskadekaphobia as it may be
seems a little less than the reasoned.
Then, where Chaitin's got "P(halts()) is about 85%,
and yes that's about either 1 or 2 s.d.s", that's
about what it is.
So, there are models where Omega or P(halts()) is
variously 0, 1, 0.5, (0.65), 0.85, 0.90, .95, 0.98, .0.99,
with regards to that being all the statistical theory
they know, vis-a-vis, that actual theory of probability,
certainty, and change (un-certainty).
It seems very like that any model having
only one of those is _Wrong_.
Also for health it's to be avoided skin-lighteners
and hair-darkeners.