Sujet : Re: Negative translation for propositional linear (or affine) logic?
De : julio (at) *nospam* diegidio.name (Julio Di Egidio)
Groupes : sci.logicDate : 01. Dec 2024, 14:44:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vihp72$2eqeg$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 01/12/2024 14:15, Mild Shock wrote:
"Type system" can be another word for "logic with
proof terms", if you look at:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curry%E2%80%93Howard_correspondence
Indeed, a proof tree is a program and a solver is a compiler. But the real point is about *pure* *formal* logic, how it works and is the only thing that works, as long as it pure: i.e. Logic proper is exactly outside and above it, before and after any mechanics.
The received meta-theories and "philosophies" are completely upside down and yet another global fraud on top of the genocides. And the advent of their "AI", sold as a solution to problems when it's really the lobotomy on a side and the lying with numbers on the other: another nail in the global coffin.
-Julio