Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 02.12.2024 09:41, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-12-01 10:55:15 +0000, WM said:

 

What does "contradicts a bijection" mean?
 

It shows that the mapping claimed to be a bijection is not a bijection.

 If so, no bijection is contradicted.

 The *claim* that a bijection is possible is disproved.

 The possibility of a bijection between the sets  ℕ = {1, 2, 3, ...} and D = {10n | n ∈ ℕ} is contradicted.

 No, it is not. You merely deny it, disregarding obvious facts.

 Obvious is that for every interval (0, n] the relative covering is 1/10, and that there are no further black hats beyond all natnumbers n.

 Irrelevant to everything quoted above.

You are unable to understand?