Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.logicDate : 09. Dec 2024, 15:44:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vj6vp0$elqh$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 08.12.2024 21:40, joes wrote:
Am Fri, 29 Nov 2024 20:28:02 +0100 schrieb WM:
No, I am using a very simple and sound rule. If all hats of finite
intervals (0, n] fail to cover more than 1/10,
Of course they „fail”, they are a subset.
That does never change.
Regards, WM