Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : sci.logicDate : 15. Dec 2024, 22:13:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <75665d57aed306de96df0672e143c8e0e086a3e0@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/15/24 2:22 PM, WM wrote:
On 15.12.2024 13:52, Richard Damon wrote:
Note, v. Neuman starts at 0, not 1,
That is irrelevant. He uses FISONs.
Regards, WM
No, he defines numbers as sets.
It seems YOU are the one trying to interpret them as FISONs.