Sujet : Re: Proofs as programs
De : julio (at) *nospam* diegidio.name (Julio Di Egidio)
Groupes : sci.logicDate : 18. Dec 2024, 10:56:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vju67k$1m603$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 18/12/2024 08:43, Mild Shock wrote:
The advent of logic tasks are not philosophical,
they directly ask for a calculus aka proof search
in Prolog. You could add some philosophical notes
to the resulting Prolog code.
"Philosophy" as in not being a vacuous dumb fuck? I hope.
I was asking if my work would qualify for your challenge, in fact what the challenge even is, since you cannot write a problem statement that is one.
When you have missed that point, I have pointed out that accessorized system variant 1765234 is utterly uninteresting when pure system 0 is already a difficult foundational then coding problem otherwise a cheat.
But don't take my word for it.
-Julio