Re: Mathematical incompleteness has always been a misconception --- Tarski

On 11/02/2025 03:19, Ross Finlayson wrote:

We live in a yellow submarine, just yellower and yellower.

 The Comenius language that Comenius posits, is also
like Leibniz' universal language, which also he posits,

Language is a tool in Leibniz, not the primary thing.
<https://seprogrammo.blogspot.com/2024/01/on-logic-of-it.html>
Indeed, all you keep spouting is rather anti-Leibniz.
Not per chance, in this empire of fundamental inversions.

like Nietzsche's eternal text, which he bemoans its
absence, and like Quine in Word & Object, ignores.
 A footnote in Quine refers to Russell's inconstancy,
or mere generously, development, with regards to
"never knowing what he is talking about".
 Nietzsche as well had a later greater return
to Platonism, though it was much less promoted
since logical positivists of a particular formal
variety don't care for it.
 Then the pre-geometric (technical, mathematical, ideal)
and pre-scientific (technical, scientific, analytical)
have that Derrida for Husserl very much has it so
part of the Lebenswelt, which we inhabit.
 (analytical)

I once wrote a little word randomizer: given any text in
input, it spit out prose that was more honest than yours.
-Julio