Re: Mathematical incompleteness has always been a misconception --- Ultimate Foundation of Truth

On 2/28/2025 4:46 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-25 21:10:10 +0000, olcott said:
 

On 2/25/2025 9:35 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-24 21:44:10 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 2/24/2025 2:58 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-22 18:42:44 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 2/22/2025 3:25 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-22 04:44:35 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 2/21/2025 7:05 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 2/21/25 6:19 PM, olcott wrote:

On 2/20/2025 2:54 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-18 03:59:08 +0000, olcott said:

>
>

Tarski anchored his whole proof in the Liar Paradox.
>

>
By showing that given the necessary prerequisites, The equivalent of the Liar Paradox was a statement that the Truth Predicate had to be able to handle, which it can't.
>

>
It can be easily handled as ~True(LP) & ~True(~LP), Tarski just
didn't think it through.

>
No, it can't. Tarski requires that True be a predicate, i.e, a truth
valued function of one term.

>
It does not matter a whit what the Hell his misconceptions
required.

>
It is not required by any misconception. It is required by the
meanings of the words and symbols, in particular "predicare"
and "~".

>
That none of modern logic can handle expressions
that are not truth bearers is their error and
short-coming.

>
Why should any logic permit formulas that are not truth-bearers?
(Of course, term expressions are not truth-bearers.)

>
Undecidable expressions are only undecidable because they
are not truth bearers. Logic ignores this and faults the
system and not the expression

 An undecidable expression is a thruth bearer.

Truth bearer means unequivocally divided into exactly
one of true or false. It assumes something like the
syllogism that has all of its relevant semantics precisely
specified using categorical propositions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syllogism#Basic_structure
see page 6
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333907915_Proof_that_Wittgenstein_is_correct_about_Godel As I independently figured out and Wittgenstein concurs
true in the system must have a truth bearer in the system.
It is a very stupid idea to have provable outside of the system
to mean true in the system. That G is provable in meta-math does
not make G true in math.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer