Sujet : Re: There is no logic here (Was: Quine's "Word & Object")
De : julio (at) *nospam* diegidio.name (Julio Di Egidio)
Groupes : sci.logicDate : 23. Mar 2025, 15:59:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vrp7kh$2gelp$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 23/03/2025 14:49, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
On 23/03/2025 03:46, Ross Finlayson wrote:
Indeed, Strawson isn't less misrepresented then ignored than
Socrates vs Plato/Aristotle, or Leibniz vs Kant/Newton, or the
first Wittgenstein vs Frege/Russell...
Or Euclid, who's the father of Logic proper, how to reason validly
and cogently, yet passes for the father of mathematics as axiomatics,
eventually up to the "categories", strictly mathematical of course...
I'll stop there, it's just all over the place. So much so that I
think recognising and enacting it is a personal responsibility, of
the not (yet? anymore!) totally oblivious.
-Julio
Quine's "Word & Object"
Re: There is no logic here (Was: Quine's "Word & Object")