Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : sci.logic
Date : 24. Mar 2025, 03:25:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vrqfrd$3ns7l$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/23/2025 7:37 PM, joes wrote:
Am Sun, 23 Mar 2025 16:10:46 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 3/22/2025 9:53 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 3/22/25 1:49 PM, olcott wrote:
On 3/22/2025 11:38 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-03-22 03:03:39 +0000, olcott said:
On 3/21/2025 9:31 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 3/21/25 9:24 PM, olcott wrote:
On 3/21/2025 7:50 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 3/21/25 8:40 PM, olcott wrote:
On 3/21/2025 6:49 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 3/21/25 8:43 AM, olcott wrote:
On 3/21/2025 3:41 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-03-20 14:57:16 +0000, olcott said:
On 3/20/2025 6:00 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 3/19/25 10:42 PM, olcott wrote:
 
True(X) ONLY validates that X is true and does nothing else.
We can believe the "nothing else" part. The rest would require a
proof.
True(X) is a predicate implementing a membership algorithm for the
body of general knowledge that can be expressed using language.
Then it isnt a truth predicate, but a Knowledge predicate, and thus you
are admitting to just being a liar about all you claimed.
It <is> as I have always said that it <is> a True(X) predicate for every
element of the set of general knowledge that can be expressed in
language.

And not for true non-elements.
 
It will know when X is true and ~Y is true
and LP is not true and ~LP is not true.

That you just can't keep track of this is your mistake not my deception.
Your deception is that you call all unknowns false.
 
True(X) with a domain of the set of general knowledge that
can be expressed in language works the same way as Prolog.
Can X be derived by applying Prolog Rules to Prolog Facts?

It excludes things like what you had for lunch today what a rose smells
like... It includes every word of every textbook every written encoded
in such a way that it fully understands all of these words.

It also excludes unknown truths.
 
As any set of knowledge must do.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Mar 25 * How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge333olcott
20 Mar 25 +* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge92Richard Damon
20 Mar 25 i`* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge91olcott
21 Mar 25 i +* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge3Richard Damon
21 Mar 25 i i`* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge2olcott
21 Mar 25 i i `- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge1Richard Damon
21 Mar 25 i `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge87Mikko
21 Mar 25 i  `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge86olcott
22 Mar 25 i   +* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge68Richard Damon
22 Mar 25 i   i`* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge67olcott
22 Mar 25 i   i `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge66Richard Damon
22 Mar 25 i   i  `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge65olcott
22 Mar 25 i   i   +* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge63Richard Damon
22 Mar 25 i   i   i`* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge62olcott
22 Mar 25 i   i   i +* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge29joes
22 Mar 25 i   i   i i+* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge27olcott
22 Mar 25 i   i   i ii+* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge8joes
22 Mar 25 i   i   i iii`* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge7olcott
22 Mar 25 i   i   i iii `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge6Richard Damon
22 Mar 25 i   i   i iii  `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---WHY DO THIS?5olcott
23 Mar 25 i   i   i iii   `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---WHY DO THIS?4Richard Damon
23 Mar 25 i   i   i iii    `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---WHY DO THIS?3olcott
23 Mar 25 i   i   i iii     +- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---WHY DO THIS?1Richard Damon
23 Mar 25 i   i   i iii     `- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---WHY DO THIS?1Richard Damon
22 Mar 25 i   i   i ii`* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge18Richard Damon
22 Mar 25 i   i   i ii `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---ZFC17olcott
23 Mar 25 i   i   i ii  `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---ZFC16Richard Damon
23 Mar 25 i   i   i ii   `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---ZFC15olcott
23 Mar 25 i   i   i ii    +* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---ZFC3Richard Damon
23 Mar 25 i   i   i ii    i`* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---ZFC2olcott
23 Mar 25 i   i   i ii    i `- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---ZFC1Richard Damon
25 Mar 25 i   i   i ii    `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---ZFC11Mikko
25 Mar 25 i   i   i ii     `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---ZFC10olcott
26 Mar 25 i   i   i ii      +* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---ZFC3Richard Damon
26 Mar 25 i   i   i ii      i`* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---ZFC2olcott
26 Mar 25 i   i   i ii      i `- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---ZFC1Richard Damon
26 Mar 25 i   i   i ii      `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---ZFC6Mikko
26 Mar 25 i   i   i ii       `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---ZFC5olcott
27 Mar 25 i   i   i ii        +* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---ZFC3Richard Damon
27 Mar 25 i   i   i ii        i`* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---ZFC2olcott
27 Mar 25 i   i   i ii        i `- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---ZFC1Richard Damon
27 Mar 25 i   i   i ii        `- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge ---ZFC1Mikko
22 Mar 25 i   i   i i`- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge1Mikko
22 Mar 25 i   i   i +* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge11Richard Damon
22 Mar 25 i   i   i i`* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge10olcott
22 Mar 25 i   i   i i +* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge5Richard Damon
22 Mar 25 i   i   i i i`* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge4olcott
23 Mar 25 i   i   i i i `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge3Richard Damon
23 Mar 25 i   i   i i i  `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge2olcott
24 Mar 25 i   i   i i i   `- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge1joes
25 Mar 25 i   i   i i `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge4Mikko
25 Mar 25 i   i   i i  `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge3olcott
26 Mar 25 i   i   i i   +- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge1Richard Damon
26 Mar 25 i   i   i i   `- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge1Mikko
22 Mar 25 i   i   i `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge21Mikko
22 Mar 25 i   i   i  `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)20olcott
23 Mar 25 i   i   i   +* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)6Richard Damon
23 Mar 25 i   i   i   i`* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)5olcott
23 Mar 25 i   i   i   i +- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)1Richard Damon
24 Mar 25 i   i   i   i `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)3joes
24 Mar 25 i   i   i   i  `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)2olcott
24 Mar 25 i   i   i   i   `- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)1Richard Damon
25 Mar 25 i   i   i   `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)13Mikko
25 Mar 25 i   i   i    `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)12olcott
26 Mar 25 i   i   i     +* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)8Richard Damon
26 Mar 25 i   i   i     i`* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)7olcott
26 Mar 25 i   i   i     i `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)6Richard Damon
26 Mar 25 i   i   i     i  `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)5olcott
26 Mar 25 i   i   i     i   +- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)1Mikko
26 Mar 25 i   i   i     i   `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)3Richard Damon
26 Mar 25 i   i   i     i    `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)2olcott
27 Mar 25 i   i   i     i     `- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)1Richard Damon
26 Mar 25 i   i   i     `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)3Mikko
26 Mar 25 i   i   i      `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)2olcott
27 Mar 25 i   i   i       `- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge (GKEUL)1Mikko
22 Mar 25 i   i   `- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge1Mikko
22 Mar 25 i   `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge17Mikko
22 Mar 25 i    +* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge13olcott
22 Mar 25 i    i+* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge11Richard Damon
22 Mar 25 i    ii`* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge10olcott
22 Mar 25 i    ii +* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge8joes
22 Mar 25 i    ii i`* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge7olcott
23 Mar 25 i    ii i +- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge1Richard Damon
23 Mar 25 i    ii i `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge5joes
23 Mar 25 i    ii i  `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge4olcott
23 Mar 25 i    ii i   `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge3Richard Damon
23 Mar 25 i    ii i    `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge2olcott
23 Mar 25 i    ii i     `- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge1Richard Damon
23 Mar 25 i    ii `- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge1Richard Damon
25 Mar 25 i    i`- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge1Mikko
25 Mar 25 i    `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge3olcott
26 Mar 25 i     +- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge1Richard Damon
26 Mar 25 i     `- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge1Mikko
20 Mar 25 `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge240Mikko
20 Mar 25  `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge239olcott
21 Mar 25   +* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge3Richard Damon
21 Mar 25   i`* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge2olcott
21 Mar 25   i `- Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge1Richard Damon
21 Mar 25   `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge235Mikko
21 Mar 25    `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge234olcott
22 Mar 25     +* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge12Richard Damon
22 Mar 25     `* Re: How a True(X) predicate can be defined for the set of analytic knowledge221Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal