Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s logic |
Am Sun, 23 Mar 2025 16:10:46 -0500 schrieb olcott:On 3/22/2025 9:53 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/22/25 1:49 PM, olcott wrote:On 3/22/2025 11:38 AM, Mikko wrote:On 2025-03-22 03:03:39 +0000, olcott said:On 3/21/2025 9:31 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/21/25 9:24 PM, olcott wrote:On 3/21/2025 7:50 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/21/25 8:40 PM, olcott wrote:On 3/21/2025 6:49 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/21/25 8:43 AM, olcott wrote:On 3/21/2025 3:41 AM, Mikko wrote:On 2025-03-20 14:57:16 +0000, olcott said:On 3/20/2025 6:00 AM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/19/25 10:42 PM, olcott wrote:It <is> as I have always said that it <is> a True(X) predicate for everyThen it isnt a truth predicate, but a Knowledge predicate, and thus youTrue(X) is a predicate implementing a membership algorithm for theTrue(X) ONLY validates that X is true and does nothing else.We can believe the "nothing else" part. The rest would require a
proof.
body of general knowledge that can be expressed using language.
are admitting to just being a liar about all you claimed.
element of the set of general knowledge that can be expressed in
language.
And not for true non-elements.It will know when X is true and ~Y is true
True(X) with a domain of the set of general knowledge thatThat you just can't keep track of this is your mistake not my deception.Your deception is that you call all unknowns false.
It excludes things like what you had for lunch today what a rose smells
like... It includes every word of every textbook every written encoded
in such a way that it fully understands all of these words.
It also excludes unknown truths.As any set of knowledge must do.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.