Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
De : mikko.levanto (at) *nospam* iki.fi (Mikko)
Groupes : sci.logic
Date : 27. Apr 2025, 11:00:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : -
Message-ID : <vukv7n$igon$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2025-04-26 15:59:39 +0000, olcott said:

On 4/26/2025 3:19 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-04-25 16:31:58 +0000, olcott said:
 
On 4/25/2025 3:46 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-04-24 15:11:13 +0000, olcott said:
 
On 4/23/2025 3:52 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-04-21 23:52:15 +0000, olcott said:
 
Computer Science Professor Eric Hehner PhD
and I all seem to agree that the same view
that Flibble has is the correct view.
 Others can see that their justification is defective and contradicted
by a good proof.
 Some people claim that the unsolvability of the halting problem is
unproven but nobody has solved the problem.
 For the last 22 years I have only been refuting the
conventional Halting Problem proof.
 Trying to refute. You have not shown any defect in that proof of the
theorem. There are other proofs that you don't even try to refute.
 Not at all. You have simply not been paying enough attention.
 Once we understand that Turing computable functions are only
allowed
 Turing allowed Turing machines to do whatever they can do.
 Strawman deception error of changing the subject away
from computable functions.
You are lying again. Turing machines are mientioned on the subject line
so they are on topic.

Turing Machine Computable Functions are not allowed
to output anything besides the result of applying
finite string transformations to their input.
Turing machine Computable Functions are allowed to do anything. If you
don't allow something someone whose opinion matters does.
--
Mikko

Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 Apr 25 * Re: Refutation of Turing’s 1936 Halting Problem Proof Based on Self-Referential Conflation as a Category (Type) Error9olcott
23 Apr 25 `* Re: Refutation of Turing’s 1936 Halting Problem Proof Based on Self-Referential Conflation as a Category (Type) Error8Mikko
24 Apr 25  `* Re: Refutation of Turing’s 1936 Halting Problem Proof Based on Self-Referential Conflation as a Category (Type) Error7olcott
25 Apr 25   +- Re: Refutation of Turing’s 1936 Halting Problem Proof Based on Self-Referential Conflation as a Category (Type) Error1Richard Damon
25 Apr 25   `* Re: Refutation of Turing’s 1936 Halting Problem Proof Based on Self-Referential Conflation as a Category (Type) Error5Mikko
25 Apr 25    `* Re: Refutation of Turing’s 1936 Halting Problem Proof Based on Self-Referential Conflation as a Category (Type) Error4olcott
26 Apr 25     +- Re: Refutation of Turing’s 1936 Halting Problem Proof Based on Self-Referential Conflation as a Category (Type) Error1Mikko
26 Apr 25     `* Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs2olcott
27 Apr 25      `- Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs1Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal