Re: Simple enough for every reader?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Re: Simple enough for every reader?
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.logic
Date : 18. May 2025, 15:36:22
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <acecnWZ7EY3gbbT1nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 05/18/2025 05:20 AM, WM wrote:
On 18.05.2025 12:30, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-05-17 15:00:33 +0000, WM said:
>
Are you aware of the fact that in
>
{1}
{1, 2}
{1, 2, 3}
...
{1, 2, 3, ..., n}
...
>
up to every n infinitely many natural numbers of the whole set
>
{1, 2, 3, ...}
>
are missing? Infinitely many of them will never be mentioned
individually. They are dark.
>
For example, if we pick 5 for n we have
>
{1}
{1, 2}
{1, 2, 3}
{1, 2, 3, 4}
{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}
>
then 6 and infinitely many other numbers are missing. So numbers
6, and 7 are dark as are ingfinitely many other numbers.
>
Maybe for a 3-year old child. Doves can count to 7. Earthworms may fail
at 1 already. It depends on the system. But important is that no system
can get over the infinite gap of dark numbers.
>
Regards, WM
Nein, das ist schlect.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 May16:00 * Simple enough for every reader?29WM
18 May11:30 +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?16Mikko
18 May13:03 i+- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Ross Finlayson
18 May13:20 i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?14WM
18 May15:36 i +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?5Ross Finlayson
18 May16:12 i i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4WM
19 May14:59 i i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Mikko
19 May19:56 i i  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2WM
20 May08:17 i i   `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Mikko
19 May14:57 i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?8Mikko
19 May19:53 i  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?7WM
20 May08:18 i   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?6Mikko
20 May12:17 i    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?5WM
22 May10:10 i     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4Mikko
22 May11:30 i      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3WM
23 May08:43 i       `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2Mikko
23 May09:31 i        `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
18 May23:41 `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?12Ben Bacarisse
19 May00:12  +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2olcott
19 May19:46  i`- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
19 May19:44  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?9WM
20 May01:50   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?8Ben Bacarisse
20 May08:22    +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Mikko
20 May12:15    i+- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
21 May01:51    i`- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Ben Bacarisse
20 May12:11    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4WM
21 May02:17     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Ben Bacarisse
21 May12:02      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2WM
23 May14:21       `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Ben Bacarisse

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal