Re: Simple enough for every reader?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Re: Simple enough for every reader?
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.logic
Date : 19. May 2025, 19:46:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <100fu9b$1oqf5$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 19.05.2025 01:12, olcott wrote:
On 5/18/2025 5:41 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> writes:
>
Are you aware of the fact that in
>
{1}
{1, 2}
{1, 2, 3}
...
{1, 2, 3, ..., n}
...
>
up to every n infinitely many natural numbers of the whole set
>
{1, 2, 3, ...}
>
are missing? Infinitely many of them will never be mentioned
individually. They are dark.
>
Presumably you are aware that for every n in ℕ, n will be mentioned in
infinitely many such sets?  They are bathed in light.
>
Do they still let you teach this stuff?
>
 Clearly you do not understand that any
action that takes an infinite amount of
time will never be completed. There is
always some n in ℕ that no one ever
got around to mentioning.
Correct. And simple.
Regards, WM
 

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 May 25 * Simple enough for every reader?33WM
18 May11:30 +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?18Mikko
18 May13:03 i+- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Ross Finlayson
18 May13:20 i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?16WM
18 May15:36 i +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?5Ross Finlayson
18 May16:12 i i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4WM
19 May14:59 i i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Mikko
19 May19:56 i i  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2WM
20 May08:17 i i   `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Mikko
19 May14:57 i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?10Mikko
19 May19:53 i  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?9WM
20 May08:18 i   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?8Mikko
20 May12:17 i    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?7WM
22 May10:10 i     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?6Mikko
22 May11:30 i      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?5WM
23 May08:43 i       `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4Mikko
23 May09:31 i        `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3WM
24 May09:13 i         `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2Mikko
24 May12:29 i          `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
18 May23:41 `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?14Ben Bacarisse
19 May00:12  +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2olcott
19 May19:46  i`- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
19 May19:44  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?11WM
20 May01:50   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?10Ben Bacarisse
20 May08:22    +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Mikko
20 May12:15    i+- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
21 May01:51    i`- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Ben Bacarisse
20 May12:11    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?6WM
21 May02:17     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?5Ben Bacarisse
21 May12:02      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4WM
23 May14:21       `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Ben Bacarisse
24 May09:18        +- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Mikko
24 May11:50        `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal