Re: Simple enough for every reader?

On 2025-05-18 15:12:32 +0000, WM said:
 

On 18.05.2025 16:36, Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 05/18/2025 05:20 AM, WM wrote:

On 18.05.2025 12:30, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-05-17 15:00:33 +0000, WM said:
>

Are you aware of the fact that in
>
{1}
{1, 2}
{1, 2, 3}
...
{1, 2, 3, ..., n}
...
>
up to every n infinitely many natural numbers of the whole set
>
{1, 2, 3, ...}
>
are missing? Infinitely many of them will never be mentioned
individually. They are dark.

>
For example, if we pick 5 for n we have
>
{1}
{1, 2}
{1, 2, 3}
{1, 2, 3, 4}
{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}
>
then 6 and infinitely many other numbers are missing. So numbers
6, and 7 are dark as are ingfinitely many other numbers.
>

Maybe for a 3-year old child. Doves can count to 7. Earthworms may fail
at 1 already. It depends on the system. But important is that no system
can get over the infinite gap of dark numbers.
>

Nein, das ist schlecht.

>
Aber nicht zu ändern.

 If it is that bad then don't even try to chage it. Just drop it into
a garbage can.