Re: Simple enough for every reader?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Re: Simple enough for every reader?
De : ben (at) *nospam* bsb.me.uk (Ben Bacarisse)
Groupes : sci.logic
Date : 23. May 2025, 14:21:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <874ixbxy26.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> writes:

On 21.05.2025 03:17, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> writes:
 
On 20.05.2025 02:50, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> writes:
>
I am one of the few Professors worldwide who do teach the correct view of
infinity (if actual infinity exists at all).
Fortunately it's an optional course (at least it was) and your college
>
It is not a college but the Technische Hochschule Ausgsburg (THA).
Why is college (or maybe technical college) not a good translation of
that term?
 
According to my dictionaries Colleges are parts of universities, but also
institutions not offering degrees attended by secretaries or
hairdressers. According to this translation the Technische Hochschule
Augsburg consists of several colleges. But the faculty of general studies
covers the full university of applied sciences. All students can attend my
courses.

Your dictionary is very odd.  In common English usage some colleges are
parts of universities and some are not.  Some award degrees and some
don't.  Some offer PhD studies and some don't.  I don't know what
hairdressers have to so with it.

The harm
is very much limited.
>
It is harm only for fanatic reactionaries who disregard mathematical
proofs.
That was indeed the harm I was referring to.
...
Do you disregard this mathematical proof
https://www.whitman.edu/mathematics/higher_math_online/section04.10.html
?
Yes, ...

Good to know.

--
Ben.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 May16:00 * Simple enough for every reader?29WM
18 May11:30 +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?16Mikko
18 May13:03 i+- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Ross Finlayson
18 May13:20 i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?14WM
18 May15:36 i +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?5Ross Finlayson
18 May16:12 i i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4WM
19 May14:59 i i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Mikko
19 May19:56 i i  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2WM
20 May08:17 i i   `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Mikko
19 May14:57 i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?8Mikko
19 May19:53 i  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?7WM
20 May08:18 i   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?6Mikko
20 May12:17 i    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?5WM
22 May10:10 i     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4Mikko
22 May11:30 i      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3WM
23 May08:43 i       `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2Mikko
23 May09:31 i        `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
18 May23:41 `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?12Ben Bacarisse
19 May00:12  +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2olcott
19 May19:46  i`- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
19 May19:44  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?9WM
20 May01:50   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?8Ben Bacarisse
20 May08:22    +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Mikko
20 May12:15    i+- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
21 May01:51    i`- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Ben Bacarisse
20 May12:11    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4WM
21 May02:17     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Ben Bacarisse
21 May12:02      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2WM
23 May14:21       `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Ben Bacarisse

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal