Re: Simple enough for every reader?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Re: Simple enough for every reader?
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.logic
Date : 27. May 2025, 16:18:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1014l4f$2l9jj$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 27.05.2025 14:15, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-05-26 23:21:27 +0000, Ben Bacarisse said:

Mind you, all I know if the ambition of the institution in question is
that it allows nonsense to be taught, albeit as a entirely optional
course.  That particular hochschule does not seem to be taking academic
integrity very seriously.
 Maybe the idea is that an exposure to nonsense helps students to learn
to identify nonsense when they see it.
 
There is no nonsense but most mathematicians are unable to understand my arguments and therefore do not answer them but simply curse.
The harmonic series diverges. Kempner has shown in 1914 that when all terms containing the digit 9 are removed, the series converges. Here is a simple derivation: https://www.hs-augsburg.de/~mueckenh/HI/HI02.PPT, p. 15.
That means that the terms containing 9 diverge. Same is true when all terms containing 8 are removed. That means all terms containing 8 and 9 simultaneously diverge.
We can continue and remove all terms containing 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 in the denominator without changing this. That means that only the terms containing all these digits together constitute the diverging series.
But that's not the end! We can remove any number, like 2025, and the remaining series will converge. For proof use base 2026. This extends to every definable number. Therefore the diverging part of the harmonic series is constituted only by terms containing a digit sequence including all definable numbers.
Note that here not only the first terms are cut off but that many following terms are excluded from the diverging remainder.
This is a proof of the huge set of undefinable or dark numbers.
Regards, WM

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 May 25 * Simple enough for every reader?58WM
18 May 25 +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?24Mikko
18 May 25 i+- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Ross Finlayson
18 May 25 i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?22WM
18 May 25 i +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?5Ross Finlayson
18 May 25 i i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4WM
19 May 25 i i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Mikko
19 May 25 i i  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2WM
20 May 25 i i   `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Mikko
19 May 25 i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?16Mikko
19 May 25 i  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?15WM
20 May 25 i   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?14Mikko
20 May 25 i    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?13WM
22 May10:10 i     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?12Mikko
22 May11:30 i      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?11WM
23 May08:43 i       `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?10Mikko
23 May09:31 i        `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?9WM
24 May09:13 i         `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?8Mikko
24 May12:29 i          `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?7WM
25 May11:42 i           `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?6Mikko
25 May12:38 i            `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?5WM
26 May11:26 i             `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4Mikko
26 May14:38 i              `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3WM
27 May13:01 i               `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2Mikko
27 May16:09 i                `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
18 May 25 `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?33Ben Bacarisse
19 May 25  +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2olcott
19 May 25  i`- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
19 May 25  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?30WM
20 May 25   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?29Ben Bacarisse
20 May 25    +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Mikko
20 May 25    i+- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
21 May01:51    i`- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Ben Bacarisse
20 May 25    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?25WM
21 May02:17     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?24Ben Bacarisse
21 May12:02      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?23WM
23 May14:21       `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?22Ben Bacarisse
24 May09:18        +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?8Mikko
25 May02:09        i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?7Ben Bacarisse
25 May11:43        i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?6Mikko
26 May01:56        i  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?5Ben Bacarisse
26 May11:30        i   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4Mikko
27 May00:21        i    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Ben Bacarisse
27 May13:15        i     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2Mikko
27 May16:18        i      `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
24 May11:50        `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?13WM
25 May02:27         `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?12Ben Bacarisse
25 May09:29          `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?11WM
26 May01:52           `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?10Ben Bacarisse
26 May11:17            +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?7WM
26 May11:44            i+* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4Mikko
26 May14:44            ii`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3WM
27 May13:27            ii `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2Mikko
27 May16:24            ii  `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
27 May00:57            i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2Ben Bacarisse
27 May13:15            i `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
26 May14:30            `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2WM
27 May00:58             `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Ben Bacarisse

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal