Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s logic |
WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> writes:Your statement.
(AKA Dr. Wolfgang Mückenheim or Mueckenheim who teaches "Geschichte
des Unendlichen" and "Kleine Geschichte der Mathematik" at Technische
Hochschule Augsburg.)
On 28.05.2025 01:06, Ben Bacarisse wrote:That's harsh.Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> writes:>>Maybe the idea is that an exposure to nonsense helps students to learnThey have to regurgitate the nonsense to get the marks. I once asked WM
to identify nonsense when they see it.
what would happen if a student presented real mathematics in the exam
and he said they would not get the marks.
No, you are lying.
I may simply have misremembered what you said about thisThat depends. What answer do you have in mind?
before. If so I apologise. But I see you /don't/ in fact say they that
would get the marks. You only say that they would need to be convinced
they were wrong. What if they were not convinced and stuck by the
answer they had written in the exam?
Above I assumed a personal discussion. In the exam there are questions like these:I would have asked him to explain his positionIn the UK (at least at the universities I am familiar with), exam papers
must be marked according to a pre-written mark scheme. There is no
option to interview the student after they submit their paper.
DoesTry to answer. Then I will give you marks.
this really happen in Germany? And if so, does the interview have only
one outcome -- agree or else? Do you not have to write marking schemes
for your exams? And if in fact you do, what do yours say about
alternative answers?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.