Re: Simple enough for every reader?

On 2025-06-01 14:09:23 +0000, WM said:

On 01.06.2025 13:58, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-05-31 13:47:51 +0000, WM said:
 

On 31.05.2025 12:11, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-05-30 14:46:55 +0000, WM said:
 

 

{1, 2, 3, ..., n, n+1} has infinitely many (ℵo) successors is a consequence of {1, 2, 3, ..., n} has infinitely many (ℵo) successors, and ℵo - 1 = ℵo.

 Still no proof.

 Proof that every definable natural number has more successors than predecessors.

 You have not shown that proof, either.

 I have above. You cannot understand it. That is a different thing.

 No proof of anything above. Besides, nothing that requires any
understanding beyond ordinary proof checking cannot be a proof.

 There is no further understanding required.

That contradicts your above "You cannot understand it". Therefore
my "You have not shown that proof, either" stands, as well as my
"Still no proof".
--
Mikko