Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s logic |
On 04.07.2025 13:18, joes wrote:Cardinality IS mathematics.Am Fri, 04 Jul 2025 12:15:16 +0200 schrieb WM:But cardinality is nonsense because mathematics contradicts it.On 04.07.2025 10:38, joes wrote:It is incorrect: infinite sets have subsets of the same cardinality.Am Thu, 03 Jul 2025 21:10:39 +0200 schrieb WM:But it is correct. See the last paragraph. Can you contradict it?On 03.07.2025 16:12, joes wrote:No, this is not an accepted theorem of mainstream mathematics.Am Thu, 03 Jul 2025 15:08:25 +0200 schrieb WM:>For all sets.The rule of subset proves that every proper subset has fewerNo such rule for infinite sets.
elements
All primes can be known and there is no contradiction.I said: Yes. If all prime numbers could be known, the same contradictionI didn't, and you didn't the first time.I mentioned the *known* primes....you can enumerate them in the sense of a bijection to N: there isNo, you can number the primes.Yes, there are only few known primes.
a first prime, a second and so on for every natural, which is
infinitely many.
would arise.
You: Primes are not infinite themselves.Yeah, that we know only finitely many primes has nothing to do with that.
Me: But the known primes are a potentially infinite collection.
Huh? There is a prime to every natural.I am aware that we don't know all primes, but you can't mean that.That shows that this "bijection" does not capture all natural numbers.
There aren't more naturals than primes,
one doesn't run out of primes when counting them.
Yes, Aleph_0 of both.No. You said above "There aren't more naturals than primes".That is what I said.And half of infinity is still infinite.That does not change the correct mathematics: For every interval
[0, 2n] there are half as many even numbers as natural numbers.
That is true also in the limit.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.