The Signal Collapse gives us System Uncertainty (Was: Having 2544 issues is probably a bad sign)

Hi,
1. Everybody’s a programmer now
    The barrier to entry dropped dramatically — you can
    become a "developer" with a few online tutorials
    and a GitHub account.
2. Everybody’s an academic now
    Academia expanded, but standards often fell. In
    some places, it's publish or perish, so paper
    mills and fake research flourish.
3. Signal Collapse ↔ Systemic Uncertainty
    Credentials lose meaning, No reliable markers of
    skill, Fragile systems built on shallow knowledge
4. Signal Collapse ↔ Systemic Uncertainty
    Quantity overwhelms quality, Important truths get
    buried, Bad signals drown good ones
Etc..
Bye
Mild Shock schrieb:

Hi,
 Having 2544 issues is probably a bad sign.
I find this many issues here:
 https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq/issues
 Mostlikely 90% of the issues can be move to
the new discussion feature of GitHub.
 LoL
 Bye
 P.S.: Same holds for Scryer Prolog with 406 issues.
 Mild Shock schrieb:

Hi,
>
Maybe AGI should take over proving.
Just take the humans out of the loop
of any programming, it leads to nowhere.
>
Bye
>
Julio Di Egidio schrieb:

On 10/07/2025 14:01, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

The end of the world is nigh:
>
<https://rocq-prover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/237656-Rocq-devs-.26-plugin-devs/topic/status.20and.20future.20of.20the.20phase.20split/near/528029103> >
>
 From interactive proof assistant to completely upside-down and
completely broken, and not just on that at that point of course.
>
And the fucking shamelessness...

>
But we must thank MS for the nail in that coffin, too: they can't
be satisfied with just a Lean broken by design, they must own the
whole compartment: only poisoned meatballs for the public...
>
-Julio
>

>