Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? ---Truth Maker Maximalism FULL_TRACE

On 7/17/2025 8:57 AM, joes wrote:

Am Thu, 17 Jul 2025 08:47:16 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 7/17/2025 3:29 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 16.jul.2025 om 19:49 schreef olcott:

 

This is already evidence that simulation is not the right tool to
analyse the input.

In other words you disagree that a simulation by a UTM is a correct
measure of behavior. (A simulation by a UTM is defined to be a correct
measure of behavior).

HHH is not a UTM.
 

_DDD()
[00002192] 55             push ebp
[00002193] 8bec           mov ebp,esp
[00002195] 6892210000     push 00002192  // push DDD
[0000219a] e833f4ffff     call 000015d2  // call HHH
[0000219f] 83c404         add esp,+04
[000021a2] 5d             pop ebp
[000021a3] c3             ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [000021a3]
Each element of the infinite set of functions
at machine address 000015d2 that emulates 0 to ∞
instructions of the above machine code never
reaches its emulated "ret" instruction final
halt state BECAUSE DDD CALLS EACH EMULATOR IN
RECURSIVE EMULATION.
*ChatGPT agrees and provides the reasoning why it agrees*
https://chatgpt.com/share/6877f09c-7b18-8011-b075-ea3671e57886
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer