Re: The set of necessary FISONs

On 1/28/25 4:21 AM, WM wrote:

On 28.01.2025 00:32, Richard Damon wrote:

On 1/27/25 9:33 AM, WM wrote:

 

Also an infinite set needs a first element. But no FISON is necessary or sufficient.

 

Which means the set of "necessary FISONs" doesn't exist.

 The set of useful FISONs does not exist. Otherwise name the first one.

You need to define "useful".
If you mean a member of your ill-defined set of "necessary FISONs", all you are doing is proving that you don't have a valid logic system and are falling back to proven to be erroneous logic system, and are too stupid to understand you are doing that.
Your Naive Mathematics uses Naive Logic based on the Naive Set Theory that has been shown to be inconsistent and broken.

>
That doesn't mean what you want it to mean, it just shows your logic is broken.
>
we can build an infinite number of infinite sets of FISONs whose union is the Natural Numbers,

 That is the diploma of stupidity. Name the first useful FISON!

It is the stupid that asks for things they can not define,
I guess you are just admitting that you concept of FISONs is just a stupid ruse to confuse people.
Sorry, you are just showing off your stupidity,

 Regards, WM