Sujet : Re: Log i = 0
De : dohduhdah (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (sobriquet)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 25. May 2025, 14:02:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <100v4db$1clol$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Op 25/05/2025 om 14:21 schreef Richard Hachel:
Le 25/05/2025 à 05:07, sobriquet a écrit :
Op 24/05/2025 om 21:26 schreef Richard Hachel:
Doctor Hachel said :
>
Log i = 0
>
i is a second root of f(x)=Log i
>
N.B. Log is ln.
>
R.H.
>
>
>
Somehow I have more confidence in wolfram alpha than a random usenet crackpot.
>
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=ln%28i%29
You have every right to your certainties.
R.H.
There is no certainty in math. But when you encounter conflicting claims
online you have to assess the probabilities that either side is wrong in
a nuanced way, taking into account various sources of information and how they justify their claims and whether their approach tends to yield
useful results in practice (like technology made possible by scientific insights and the math that provides the conceptual underpinnings).