Sujet : Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? (infinitary)
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 02. Nov 2024, 21:34:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <1acb1cd703640f9df3051921fc01de139f9bc5c5@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 11/2/24 1:42 PM, WM wrote:
On 02.11.2024 14:50, Moebius wrote:
Am 02.11.2024 um 14:21 schrieb joes:
Am Fri, 01 Nov 2024 18:03:26 +0100 schrieb WM:
>
If an invariable set of numbers is there, then there is a smallest and a
largest number of those which are existing.
>
or each and every n e IN there is an n' e IN (say n' = n+1)
Actual infinity is not based on claims for each and every, but concerns all.
Regards, WM
But if it applies to ALL, it must apply to ANY, so a property of ANY must apply to each on of the ALL.
So, for ALL the Natural Numbers, there can't be a highest, because for ANY Natural Number there is a following one, and if there was a Highest, it would have a property that NONE of the Natural Numbers have (not having a successor) so it couldn't have been a Natural Number.