Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : james.g.burns (at) *nospam* att.net (Jim Burns)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 08. Feb 2025, 23:18:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1dd592cd-0978-43dd-8a5a-4806ee9ee95d@att.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/8/2025 2:44 PM, WM wrote:
On 08.02.2025 12:51, Richard Damon wrote:
And thus you claim that 36 can not be factored,
as all of its factors are not needed.
>
1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18, 36.
According to Cantor,
the set of factors has a smallest element,
Also, according to Pythagoras.
The proof that √2 is irrational
derives a contradiction from the assumption that
there exists a denominator q: q⋅√2 ∈ ℕ and thus
there must be a smallest denominator q₀: q₀⋅√2 ∈ ℕ
and a smaller.than.smallest denominator q₋₁
⎛ p₀² = 2q₀²
⎜ (2p₋₁)²/2 = q₀²
⎝ p₋₁² = (2q₋₁)²/2
the set of factors has a smallest element, 1, and
the set of necessary factors has a smallest element, 6,
or if double application is not allowed, 4.
What is an unnecessary factor?
Regards, WM