Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how
De : james.g.burns (at) *nospam* att.net (Jim Burns)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 10. May 2024, 19:56:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1f4bd9ca-5ade-43c0-a50d-927ce267d059@att.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/10/2024 8:18 AM, WM wrote:
Le 08/05/2024 à 23:55, Jim Burns a écrit :
On 5/8/2024 3:55 PM, WM wrote:
Le 07/05/2024 à 00:11, Jim Burns a écrit :

All which canNOT be counted.to are not.in ℕ
>
All which canNOT be counted.to are not.in ℕ_def.
>
And all which CAN be counted.to are in ℕ_def.
>
Yes.
Thank you.
ℕ_def is the set of all and only
numbers which CAN be counted.to.
ℕ_def is what everyone else calls ℕ

ℕ_def is the set of all and only
numbers which CAN be counted.to.
ℕ_def is what everyone else calls ℕ
>
Because
almost everyone has not yet realized, that
ℕ contains also the natural numbers which
cannot be counted to and which
do not leave ℵ₀ successors after being removed from ℝ.
Weⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ use ℕ to refer to
the set of all and only
numbers which CAN be counted.to,
but we could use ℕ_def
or use ω
or use ⋃ₙ⟨⟨0…n⟩⟩
or use ♃
or use 🐎
to refer to the set of all and only
numbers which CAN be counted.to.
Whichever way we refer to it,
all which canNOT be counted.to are not.in it
and all which CAN be counted.to are in it

|ℕ_def| = ℵ₀
>
ℕ_def is a potentially infinite collection
and as such has no fxed number of elements.
ℕ_def  ℕⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ  ω  ⋃ₙ⟨⟨0…n⟩⟩  ♃  🐎  is
the set of all and only numbers which CAN be counted.to
and as such its elements are fixed,
because nothing exists which is
partly.countable.to and partly.not.countable.to.
Nothing is partly.in and partly.out.

We use the indefinite oo in this case.
Weⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ use ℵ₀ to refer to |ℕ_def|
But we could use
|ℕⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ|  |ω|  |⋃ₙ⟨⟨0…n⟩⟩|  |♃|  |🐎|
to refer to |ℕ_def|
The claims weⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ make for
ℕ_def  ℕⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ  ω  ⋃ₙ⟨⟨0…n⟩⟩  ♃  🐎
are NOT altered by
pretending weⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ are NOT referring to
the set of all and only numbers which CAN be counted.to

But every n ∈ ℕ_def has ℵ₀ successors
which never vanish by counting.
They can be removed only collectively
such that nothing of ℕ remains.
Without a supertask,
ℵ₀.many of anything never vanish by counting.
Fewer.than.ℵ₀ of something can vanish by counting
-- in principle, unbounded by our 13.7Gyo universe.
All the numbers which CAN be counted.to
never vanish by counting
because
each number which CAN be counted.to  is NOT
the last number which CAN be counted.to.
For NO number which can be counted.to  is
"up to that number" the same as
"all the numbers which can be counted.to".
Any possible numbers which canNOT be counted.to
are irrelevant to
that fact about numbers which CAN be counted.to.
Also,
each number which CAN be counted.to
can vanish by counting.
In summary,
there are infinitely.many finitely.preceded numbers.
Changing what ℕ refers to doesn't change that.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Mar 24 * V1414WM
24 Mar 24 +* Re: V20Chris M. Thomasson
24 Mar 24 i`* Re: V19WM
24 Mar 24 i `* Re: V18Chris M. Thomasson
24 Mar 24 i  `* Re: V17WM
24 Mar 24 i   +* Re: V15Chris M. Thomasson
25 Mar 24 i   i`* Re: V14WM
26 Mar 24 i   i +* Re: V11Chris M. Thomasson
26 Mar 24 i   i i`* Re: V10WM
26 Mar 24 i   i i +* Re: V6Chris M. Thomasson
27 Mar 24 i   i i i`* Re: V5WM
27 Mar 24 i   i i i `* Re: V4Chris M. Thomasson
28 Mar 24 i   i i i  `* Re: V3WM
28 Mar 24 i   i i i   `* Re: V2Chris M. Thomasson
28 Mar 24 i   i i i    `- Re: V1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Mar 24 i   i i +- Re: V1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Mar 24 i   i i `* Re: V2Chris M. Thomasson
26 Mar 24 i   i i  `- Re: V1Chris M. Thomasson
11 Jun 24 i   i `* Re: V2Chris M. Thomasson
11 Jun 24 i   i  `- Re: V1Moebius
24 Mar 24 i   `- Re: V1Chris M. Thomasson
24 Mar 24 +* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1383WM
24 Mar 24 i+* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1301Dieter Heidorn
25 Mar 24 ii`* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1300WM
25 Mar 24 ii +* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets2Richard Damon
25 Mar 24 ii i`- Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1WM
25 Mar 24 ii `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1297Jim Burns
26 Mar 24 ii  `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1296WM
26 Mar 24 ii   `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1295Jim Burns
26 Mar 24 ii    +* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1283Chris M. Thomasson
26 Mar 24 ii    i`* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1282Jim Burns
27 Mar 24 ii    i `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1281WM
27 Mar 24 ii    i  +* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1279Jim Burns
28 Mar 24 ii    i  i`* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1278WM
28 Mar 24 ii    i  i +- Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1Chris M. Thomasson
29 Mar 24 ii    i  i `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1276Richard Damon
30 Mar 24 ii    i  i  `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1275WM
30 Mar 24 ii    i  i   `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1274Richard Damon
31 Mar 24 ii    i  i    `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1273WM
31 Mar 24 ii    i  i     +* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1271Richard Damon
1 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i`* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1270WM
1 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i +- Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1FromTheRafters
2 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1268Richard Damon
2 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i  `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1267WM
2 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i   `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1266Jim Burns
2 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i    +* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets9Moebius
2 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i    i`* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets8Jim Burns
3 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i    i +- Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1Moebius
3 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i    i `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets6Jim Burns
3 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i    i  `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets5Jim Burns
4 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i    i   `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets4Ross Finlayson
4 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i    i    `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets3Jim Burns
5 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i    i     `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets2Jim Burns
6 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i    i      `- Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1Jim Burns
3 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i    `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1256WM
3 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     +* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1223FromTheRafters
4 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     i+- Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1Ross Finlayson
4 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     i+* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1220WM
4 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii+* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets7Richard Damon
4 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     iii`* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets6WM
4 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     iii +* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets4Richard Damon
5 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     iii i`* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets3WM
5 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     iii i `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets2Richard Damon
6 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     iii i  `- Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1Ross Finlayson
4 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     iii `- Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1Tom Bola
5 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii`* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1212FromTheRafters
6 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1211WM
6 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii  `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1210Richard Damon
6 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii   `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1209WM
6 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii    `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1208Richard Damon
6 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii     `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1207WM
6 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii      `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1206Richard Damon
7 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii       `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1205WM
7 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii        `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1204Richard Damon
7 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii         `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1203WM
7 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii          `* how1202Richard Damon
8 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii           `* Re: how1201WM
9 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii            `* Re: how1200Richard Damon
9 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             +* Re: how1180WM
10 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i+* Re: how2Chris M. Thomasson
10 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             ii`- Re: how1Chris M. Thomasson
10 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i`* Re: how1177Richard Damon
10 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i +* Re: how8WM
11 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i`* Re: how7Richard Damon
11 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i `* Re: how6WM
12 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i  `* Re: how5Richard Damon
12 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i   `* Re: how4WM
12 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i    `* Re: how3Richard Damon
12 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i     `* Re: how2WM
12 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i      `- Re: how1Richard Damon
10 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i +* Re: how1167WM
11 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i+- Re: how1FromTheRafters
11 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i`* Re: how1165Richard Damon
11 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i `* Re: how1164WM
11 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i  +* Re: how1155Jim Burns
12 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i  i`* Re: how1154WM
12 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i  i +* Re: how29Tom Bola
12 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i  i i+* Re: how26WM
12 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i  i ii+- Re: how1Tom Bola
12 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i  i ii+* Re: how23Tom Bola
12 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i  i iii`* Re: how22WM
12 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i  i ii`- Re: how1Chris M. Thomasson
12 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i  i i`* Re: how2Chris M. Thomasson
12 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i  i `* Re: how1124Jim Burns
12 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i i  `* Re: how8Richard Damon
11 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             i `- Re: how1Chris M. Thomasson
18 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     ii             `* Re: how19Phil Carmody
5 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     i`- Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1FromTheRafters
4 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i     `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets32Jim Burns
31 Mar 24 ii    i  i     `- Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Mar 24 ii    i  `- Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1Richard Damon
26 Mar 24 ii    `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets11WM
24 Mar 24 i+* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets4Richard Damon
24 Mar 24 i+* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets71FromTheRafters
31 Mar 24 i`* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets6Moebius
24 Mar 24 +* Re: V6FromTheRafters
2 Jun 24 `* Re: V4Moebius

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal