Re: universal quantifiers, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how

On 6/7/2024 1:25 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 06/07/2024 12:42 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 5/6/2024 6:34 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 5/6/2024 6:00 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 05/06/2024 01:16 PM, Jim Burns wrote:

On 5/6/2024 2:59 PM, WM wrote:

Le 05/05/2024 à 19:59, Jim Burns a écrit :

On 5/3/2024 4:31 PM, WM wrote:

>

If all could be counted to,
they would not remain after every counted number.

>
Of those which CAN be counted.to,
each CAN be counted to.

[...]
>
Ross, WM thinks that there is a largest natural number. Shit happens.
>

>
{(1), (1, 2), (1, 2, 3), (1, 2, 3, 4), ...}
>
An infinite amount of different finite sets dealing with natural numbers
are already in the infinite set of natural numbers.

>
How about Robert Grosseteste and aliquot parts.
>
>

>
If any finite is comprised of natural numbers then every element is
already in the set of natural numbers... Fair enough?