Sujet : Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? (infinitary)
De : james.g.burns (at) *nospam* att.net (Jim Burns)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 01. Nov 2024, 14:21:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <2bb9c7a7-4fc9-497a-9f81-caea88dc0d4d@att.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/31/2024 4:18 PM, WM wrote:
On 31.10.2024 19:34, Jim Burns wrote:
On 10/31/2024 1:41 PM, WM wrote:
On 31.10.2024 13:22, Jim Burns wrote:
On 10/31/2024 4:13 AM, WM wrote:
Neither
∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0
nor
∀ᴿx > 0: ∀n ∈ ℕ: ⅟⌈n+⅟x⌉ ∈ ⅟ℕ∩(0,x]
is wrong.
>
But the first formula predicts that
only single unit fractions
are existing on the real line.
How could NUF(x) grow from zero by more than 1?
>
Is
⎛ ∀ᴿx > 0:
⎜ ∀n ∈ ℕ:
⎝ ⅟⌈n+⅟x⌉ ∈ ⅟ℕ∩(0,x]
wrong?
>
One of two contradicting formulas must be dropped.
>
Which (inside.quantifiers) formula is
the last which you accept with all prior formulas?
Is _accepting_ too hard for you?
Are there _any (inside quantifiers) formulas at all_
which you accept with all prior formulas?
⎛ ∀ᴿx > 0:
⎜ ∀n ∈ ℕ:
⎜ x > 0
⎜ ⅟x > 0
⎜ n+⅟x ≥ ⅟x > 0
⎜ ⌈n+⅟x⌉ ≥ ⅟x > 0
⎜ ⌈n+⅟x⌉ ∈ ℕ
⎜ ⅟⌈n+⅟x⌉ ∈ ⅟ℕ
⎜ x⋅⌈n+⅟x⌉ ≥ x⋅⅟x > 0
⎜ x⋅⌈n+⅟x⌉⋅⅟⌈n+⅟x⌉ ≥ 1⋅⅟⌈n+⅟x⌉ > 0
⎜ x ≥ ⅟⌈n+⅟x⌉ > 0
⎜ ⅟⌈n+⅟x⌉ ∈ (0,x] ∧ ⅟⌈n+⅟x⌉ ∈ ⅟ℕ
⎝ ⅟⌈n+⅟x⌉ ∈ ⅟ℕ∩(0,x]
⎛ ∀n ∈ ℕ⁺:
⎜ n > 0
⎜ n+1 > n > 0
⎜ ⅟n⋅(n+1)⋅⅟(n+1) > ⅟n⋅n⋅⅟(n+1)
⎜ ⅟n > ⅟(n+1)
⎜ ⅟n - ⅟(n+1) > ⅟(n+1) - ⅟(n+1)
⎝ ⅟n - ⅟(n+1) > 0
Which one requires that
NUF(x) can grow at an x ∈ ℝ by more than 1?
With a little more work, both
∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0
and
∀ᴿx > 0: ∀n ∈ ℕ: ⅟⌈n+⅟x⌉ ∈ ⅟ℕ∩(0,x]
show that
NUF(x) grows at 0 to ℵ₀
Will you (WM) also be ignoring
the work which shows
NUF(x) grows at 0 to ℵ₀ ?
Regards, WM