Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 15. Nov 2024, 12:31:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <5b085f20fd9f5ec67026fb86f41654bb79e4868c@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Fri, 15 Nov 2024 11:04:33 +0100 schrieb WM:
It can be proven for every finite geometric figure that covering it by
small pieces or intervals does not depend on the individuality and
therefore on the order of the pieces.
That means if there is a configuration where the figure is not covered
completely, every possible shuffling will also fail.
Duh. If some configuration doesn't cover it, shuffling the pieces changes
nothing. But there may be other configurations that do cover the figure.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.