Re: The set of necessary FISONs

On 1/30/25 2:30 PM, WM wrote:

On 30.01.2025 15:30, Richard Damon wrote:

On 1/30/25 4:14 AM, WM wrote:

On 29.01.2025 13:46, Richard Damon wrote:
>

We can in fact build an infinite set of infinite sets of FISONs whose union is the set of Natural Numbers,

>
>
Do it. Build such a set. I will show that it fails because all FISONs are useless for reaching the aim.

>
I did.

 Show the first element that cannot be discarded without changing the union.
 Regards, WM
 

Why?
The question is can we use a set of FISONs, to be unioned together to make the Natural Numbers,
I did that,
TO add nonsense qualifications to that is just nonsense.
As I pointed out, you logic says that the number 36 can't be factored, as the set of neccessary factors for it is empty.
All you are doing is proving you don't undetstand what you are talking about, and are too stupid to see the problem.
Sorry, but that is the facts, even if you can't understand it with your brain just being a black hole from the explosion to smithereen from the contradictions of your logic.