Sujet : Re: 2N=E
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 23. Oct 2024, 19:59:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <6c929080fc639ef2e26217ccd2908b1face54361@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Wed, 23 Oct 2024 20:03:48 +0200 schrieb WM:
On 23.10.2024 13:37, Richard Damon wrote:
Your complete set of the Natural Numbers is not complete.
I take what is given: the complete set of natural numbers. I double it
an get, according to mathematics 2n > n greater numbers than were given
to me.
Every single number is greater than its original, but for every number
in the mapped set there is a greater one in the former set.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.