Sujet : Re: universe set?
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 18. Jun 2024, 22:33:40
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <6wKdncQ4Ibe0YOz7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 06/18/2024 02:29 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 06/18/2024 06:18 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
David Chmelik has brought this to us :
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:05:45 -0000 (UTC), David Chmelik wrote:
>
Is the universe set called univrset?
>
'universet'
>
Domain of Discourse. Usually a blackboard bold (or doublestruck) D is
the symbol.
>
See for exampler Forster's "Set Theory with a Universal Set".
>
The idea that a universal set exists is called "Domain Principle"
or "Domainprinzip".
>
The domain of discourse is a usual term.
>
See for example Finsler and Boffa, Kunen inconsistency,
set of all sets, order type of ordinals, group of all groups,
infinite-dimensional space, "Continuum", sometimes just
"the world".
>
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHS0VKOM09U"Thomas Forster - Recent developments in Set Theory with a Universal Set"
I don't vouch for this yet it's part of the study, about
things like "New Foundations with Ur-Elements" or
"New Foundations with Universes" and so on.
Here's it's "Null Axiom Theory" or "Universal Axiom Theory",
for example.