Sujet : Re: how
De : james.g.burns (at) *nospam* att.net (Jim Burns)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 05. Jun 2024, 22:46:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <7a22d1b8-922a-41af-906d-cac288fc5e79@att.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/5/2024 4:59 PM, Moebius wrote:
Am 05.06.2024 um 21:28 schrieb Jim Burns:
What do you (WM) think that proves?
>
Do you REALLY think that
he read you exposition in full?
>
-> See: https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BZDQwMjNiMTQtY2UwYy00NjhiLTk0ZWEtZWM5ZWMzNGFjNTVkXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTQxNzMzNDI@._V1_.jpg
>
I really think that it's not my job
to choose for Mückenheim what to ignore.
And maybe the horse will sing.
And, again, really, a lot of what I post,
especially in the longer expositions,
are really more for my own benefit than for his,
to get straight in my mind how all this works.
It feels good after time spent staring into the abyss.
And, less than angelically, again again, really,
maybe if my exposition is convincing enough,
Mückenheim will at least _feel bad_
about posting such crap.
Do you find a motive of _revenge_ believable?