Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 27. Jan 2025, 15:14:33
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <814297ada299a65bb9f427ddec5646afcc94be9f@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Mon, 27 Jan 2025 12:35:56 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 26.01.2025 23:31, Richard Damon wrote:
you can't show that the first FISON isn't a member of the set of
necessary FISONs without assuming the set of necessary FISONs exists.
Logic? The set ℕ exists. And I can show that every FISON is neither
necessary nor sufficient to accomplish that aim.
Obviously, but not for infinite sets of FISONs.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.