Re: The set of necessary FISONs

On 1/28/25 10:15 AM, WM wrote:

On 28.01.2025 13:45, Richard Damon wrote:

On 1/28/25 3:58 AM, WM wrote:

 

Many sets of FISONs whose union is N exist, and each of those sets has a first element.

 Name the first element of only one of those sets which is required in that set.
 Regards, WM
 

You mean to your set that can only be defined in Naive Set Theory, showing that your "logic" is just broken.
YOU are the one that says there needs to be a "required" FISON.
Since I already proved that no individual FISON can be required, you are just admitting that you are too stupid to understand your own discussion.
All you are doing is humiliating your self, but in a way you don't understand because you are just showing off your utter stupidity.