Sujet : Re: how
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 26. May 2024, 19:53:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <LaKBDZjh_ayaMkDsulyY_Nw12Gs@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 23/05/2024 à 21:52, Jim Burns a écrit :
On 5/23/2024 8:10 AM, WM wrote:
WM:
Between two unit fractions
there are ℵo real numbers x.
Between any two ⅟m < ⅟n
there are more.than.any.k<ℵ₀ real.points
Even between 0 and any 1/n there are at least ℵ₀ real points.
I have shown the way: Dark numbers.
Darkᵂᴹ numbers in ℚ and between splits of ℚ
which are between 0 and all unit fractions
do not exist, neither darklyᵂᴹ nor visiblyᵂᴹ
What is closer to zero, a unit fraction or a not unit fraction?
We can know that they don't exist by starting with
that description and then making not.first.false
claims until we get to a contradiction.
The contradiction is ∀x ∈ (0, 1]: NUF(x) = ℵo because the unit fractions are x ∈ (0, 1].
They cannot sit at a single point x, hence the statememt is false.
Also true:
There is no x > 0 smaller than all unit fractions.
That implies that there is a unit fractions smaller than all other x > 0.
and even in accordance with
For any unit fraction there are ℵ₀ smaller real x > 0.
Also true:
For any x > 0 there are ℵ₀ smaller unit fractions.
Impossible because the unit fractions cannot be smaller than themselves.
Note that
points on the real axis are fixed and
not subject to quantifier nonsense.
Regards, WM