Sujet : Re: Does the number of nines increase?
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 09. Jul 2024, 17:53:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <QIFomx_kFHOP21iy8SnBBbOZzjE@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 09/07/2024 à 16:35, Moebius a écrit :
Am 09.07.2024 um 15:23 schrieb joes:
Am Tue, 09 Jul 2024 11:49:21 +0000 schrieb WM:
many don't understand that ℵo unit fractions cannot occupy a distance
smaller than all positive distances. Can you?
What does this mean? It should read "smaller than ANY".
Es bedeutet, dass Mückenheim (in diesem Kontext) nicht zwischen AxEy und EyAx unterscheiden kann.
That is nonsense. Either there is a first unit fraction or this is not the case. If it is not the case, then NUF(x) increases by more than 1, say by X, at that x where it is leaving 0. But then there must exist an x occupied by more than one, namely by X, unit fractions. Contradiction.
No quantifier magic.
Regards, WM
…