Sujet : Re: Does the number of nines increase?
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 08. Jul 2024, 21:47:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <_Vg1U_Mf84asRBWfLUWkNE6XpV0@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 08/07/2024 à 22:44, joes a écrit :
Am Mon, 08 Jul 2024 19:57:33 +0000 schrieb WM:
Le 08/07/2024 à 19:33, Jim Burns a écrit :
On 7/8/2024 9:49 AM, WM wrote:
There is no point x > 0: NUF(x) < ℵ₀
That is wrong because 10 unit fractions and their finite distances
occupy a part of the positive axis which has a finite positive measure.
Therefore there exist x > 0: NUF(x) < 11. in order to accumulate ℵ₀ unit
fractions, at least 10 must exist at the beginning. Are you unable to
understand that?
Which ten.
There cannot be ℵ₀ without first 10.
There is no point x < 0: NUF(x) > 0 NUF(x) changes "at" 0.
The function f(x) = [x] changes at 1 from 0 to 1, at 2 from 1 to 2, and
so on.
The function NUF(x) changes at unit fractions by 1, but not before, not
at 0.
NUF changes at 0 from 0 to omega.
Are all mathematicians so stupid?
Regards, WM