Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 11. Jan 2025, 01:28:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <adef9ec5c327614374fdc3c3cc55d7a753e28a36@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 1/10/25 4:48 PM, WM wrote:
On 10.01.2025 21:08, Jim Burns wrote:
Where OUR infinityⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ "doesn't work",
it's you who's saying it doesn't work,
You are inconsistent. You claim that all natural numbers are an invariable set. But when all elements are doubled then your set grows, showing it is not inc´variable. That is nonsense.
Regards, WM
But the set doesn't grow.
Which element is in the doubled set that wasn't there in the first place?
Until you can solve that question, you are just conceeding that you are nothing but a stupid liar.