Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 12/9/24 4:04 AM, WM wrote:

On 08.12.2024 19:01, Jim Burns wrote:
 

You (WM) are considering
infinite dark.finite.cardinals,
which do not exist.
>

Then analysis is contradicted in set theory.
∀n ∈ ℕ: E(1)∩E(2)∩...∩E(n) = E(n).
The limit of the left-hand side is empty, the limit of the right-hand side is full, i.e. not empty.
I do not tolerate that.
 Regards, WM

Because you don't understand the rules of real analysis, because of your lack of understanding.
By your logic, 1 equals 0, so your whole world has blown up into smithereens, taking your mind with it.