Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 12/21/24 12:46 PM, WM wrote:

On 21.12.2024 04:37, Richard Damon wrote:
 

His problem is he isn't using the actual set of Natural Numbers, only a FISON of 1 to n,

 Wrong. I am using all FISONs. No natural number remains unused.
 Regards, WM
 

So, you admit to just being a liar, as you keep on talking about the Natural Numbers.
And you don't use ALL natural numbers, as you logic doesn't allow you to do the needed infiite operations to use ALL, only ANY,
No FISION uses ALL the Natural Numbers, so your claim is just shown to be stupid (like you).
Sorry, you are just showing your utter ignorance.