Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 13. Dec 2024, 19:30:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <ce570260c57ddd549106b004805ab8e868d7d053@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Fri, 13 Dec 2024 18:12:28 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 13.12.2024 13:12, Moebius wrote:
Am 12.12.2024 um 23:03 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
On 12/12/2024 6:23 AM, WM wrote:
WM wrote :
>
Most endsegments are infinite.
_All_ endsegments are infinite.
Maybe. But then there are no endsegments at all, and Cantors theory is
nonsense from the scratch.
lol. Infinite segments don’t exist?
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.