Re: The set of necessary FISONs

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : james.g.burns (at) *nospam* att.net (Jim Burns)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 22. Feb 2025, 21:29:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <e19b21b4-07f1-46ac-94f0-dac6cd114754@att.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/22/2025 5:17 AM, WM wrote:
On 21.02.2025 20:40, Jim Burns wrote:

However,
all sets Z which satisfy Infinityᶻᶠᶜ
HAVE A SUBSET which
is usable in a proof.by.inductionᶻᶠᶜ
>
Zermelo calls that set Z_0 or set of numbers.
The usable SUBSET ℕⁱᵒᵒⁱˢˢ of Zermelo's asserted Z
is its.own.only.inductive.sub.set (iooiss).
Our sets do not change.
I'm pretty sure your ℕ_def = ℕⁱᵒᵒⁱˢˢ
Our sets do not change.
Because ℕⁱᵒᵒⁱˢˢ is iooiss,
proving a subset is inductive  is
proving that  that inductive.subset is
its.own.only.inductive.sub.set,
which is ℕⁱᵒᵒⁱˢˢ
Our sets do not change.
What does 'inductive' mean?
There are multiple answers.
Each 'inductive' has its own ℕⁱᵒᵒⁱˢˢ
about which a proof.by.induction proves.
⎛ You (WM) say 'inductive S' means
⎜ ∀k:S∋k⇒S∋k+1 ∧ S∋1
⎜ Then
⎜ ℕ₁ⁱᵒᵒⁱˢˢ = {1,2,3,...}

⎜ We (matheologists) say 'inductive S' means
⎜ ∀k:S∋k⇒S∋k+1 ∧ S∋0
⎜ Then
⎜ ℕ₀ⁱᵒᵒⁱˢˢ = {0,1,2,...}

⎜ If 'inductive S' means
⎜ ∀k:S∋k⇒S∋k+1 ∧ S∋137
⎜ Then
⎜ ℕ₁₃₇ⁱᵒᵒⁱˢˢ = {137,138,139,...}

⎜ If 'inductive S' means
⎜ S∋1 ∧ ∀k:S∋k⇒S∋2⋅k
⎜ Then
⎜ Powers(2)ⁱᵒᵒⁱˢˢ = {1,2,4,8,16,...}

⎜ If 'inductive S' means
⎜ S∋2 ∧ ∀k:S∋k⇒S∋min.{i∈[k,k!+1]ᴺ:[2,k]ᵉᵃᶜʰ̷|i}
⎜ Then
⎝ Primesⁱᵒᵒⁱˢˢ = {2,3,5,7,11,...}
For each two meanings 'inductiveₓ' and 'inductiveᵥ',
there is a bijection f between ℕₓⁱᵒᵒⁱˢˢ and ℕᵥⁱᵒᵒⁱˢˢ
⎛ firstₓ  ᶠ↦  firstᵥ
⎜ if ℕₓ ∋ x  ᶠ↦  v ∈ ℕᵥ
⎝ then sucₓ(x)  ᶠ↦  sucᵥ(v)
The map f is one.to.one because
we only consider versions of 'inductive'
such that sucₓ(⋅) and sucᵥ(⋅) are one.to.one.
The map is onto ℕᵥ because
the image f(ℕₓ) ⊆ ℕᵥ is inductive.
f(ℕₓ) can only be ℕᵥⁱᵒᵒⁱˢˢ
One.to.one, onto, bijective.
For each two meanings 'inductiveₓ' and 'inductiveᵥ',
there is a bijection f between ℕₓⁱᵒᵒⁱˢˢ and ℕᵥⁱᵒᵒⁱˢˢ
which is what
  ℕₓⁱᵒᵒⁱˢˢ and ℕᵥⁱᵒᵒⁱˢˢ are _the same size_
means to us.
You (WM) can refuse to say "the same size".
It makes what you're saying less clear,
but less clarity is probably your point.
The bijection isn't sent away
by refusing to say "same size".

We can remove all numbers from Z_0 and produce the empty set.
We can remove all numbers
from {137} and produce the empty set.
{137} ≠ 137

Homework: Show the same for the set of FISONs.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Jan 25 * The set of necessary FISONs920WM
21 Jan 25 +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs51Richard Damon
21 Jan 25 i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs50WM
22 Jan 25 i `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs49Richard Damon
22 Jan 25 i  `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs48WM
22 Jan 25 i   `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs47Richard Damon
22 Jan 25 i    `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs46WM
22 Jan 25 i     +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs2Python
23 Jan 25 i     i`- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1WM
23 Jan 25 i     `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs43Richard Damon
24 Jan 25 i      `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs42WM
24 Jan 25 i       `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs41Richard Damon
25 Jan 25 i        `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs40WM
25 Jan 25 i         +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs22joes
25 Jan 25 i         i+* Re: The set of necessary FISONs17Chris M. Thomasson
26 Jan 25 i         ii`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs16WM
26 Jan 25 i         ii +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs3joes
26 Jan 25 i         ii i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs2WM
28 Jan 25 i         ii i `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Jan 25 i         ii +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs7FromTheRafters
26 Jan 25 i         ii i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs6WM
26 Jan 25 i         ii i `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs5FromTheRafters
27 Jan 25 i         ii i  `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs4WM
27 Jan 25 i         ii i   `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs3FromTheRafters
27 Jan 25 i         ii i    +- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1WM
28 Jan 25 i         ii i    `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Jan 25 i         ii `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs5Chris M. Thomasson
26 Jan 25 i         ii  +- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jan 25 i         ii  `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs3WM
27 Jan 25 i         ii   `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs2Richard Damon
28 Jan 25 i         ii    `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Jan 25 i         i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs4WM
26 Jan 25 i         i `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs3Richard Damon
26 Jan 25 i         i  `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs2WM
26 Jan 25 i         i   `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Richard Damon
25 Jan 25 i         `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs17Richard Damon
26 Jan 25 i          `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs16WM
26 Jan 25 i           +- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1joes
26 Jan 25 i           `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs14Richard Damon
26 Jan 25 i            `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs13WM
26 Jan 25 i             +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs6Richard Damon
27 Jan 25 i             i+* Re: The set of necessary FISONs4WM
27 Jan 25 i             ii+* Re: The set of necessary FISONs2FromTheRafters
27 Jan 25 i             iii`- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1FromTheRafters
27 Jan 25 i             ii`- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Richard Damon
28 Jan 25 i             i`- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jan 25 i             `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs6joes
28 Jan 25 i              `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs5WM
28 Jan 25 i               +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs3joes
28 Jan 25 i               i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs2WM
28 Jan 25 i               i `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Richard Damon
28 Jan 25 i               `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Richard Damon
21 Jan 25 +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs865Jim Burns
22 Jan 25 i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs864WM
22 Jan 25 i `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs863Jim Burns
23 Jan 25 i  `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs862WM
23 Jan 25 i   `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs861Jim Burns
24 Jan 25 i    `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs860WM
24 Jan 25 i     +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs852Jim Burns
25 Jan 25 i     i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs851WM
25 Jan 25 i     i +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs94joes
26 Jan 25 i     i i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs93WM
26 Jan 25 i     i i +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs14joes
26 Jan 25 i     i i i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs13WM
26 Jan 25 i     i i i `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs12joes
26 Jan 25 i     i i i  `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs11WM
26 Jan 25 i     i i i   +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs9joes
27 Jan 25 i     i i i   i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs8WM
27 Jan 25 i     i i i   i +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs6joes
27 Jan 25 i     i i i   i i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs5WM
27 Jan 25 i     i i i   i i +- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1joes
28 Jan 25 i     i i i   i i `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs3Richard Damon
28 Jan 25 i     i i i   i i  `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs2WM
28 Jan 25 i     i i i   i i   `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Richard Damon
27 Jan 25 i     i i i   i `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Richard Damon
26 Jan 25 i     i i i   `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Richard Damon
26 Jan 25 i     i i `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs78Richard Damon
26 Jan 25 i     i i  `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs77WM
26 Jan 25 i     i i   `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs76Richard Damon
27 Jan 25 i     i i    `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs75WM
27 Jan 25 i     i i     +- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Richard Damon
27 Jan 25 i     i i     `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs73joes
27 Jan 25 i     i i      `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs72WM
27 Jan 25 i     i i       +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs18FromTheRafters
28 Jan 25 i     i i       i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs17WM
28 Jan 25 i     i i       i +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs12FromTheRafters
28 Jan 25 i     i i       i i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs11WM
28 Jan 25 i     i i       i i +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs6FromTheRafters
28 Jan 25 i     i i       i i i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs5WM
28 Jan 25 i     i i       i i i +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs3FromTheRafters
29 Jan 25 i     i i       i i i i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs2WM
29 Jan 25 i     i i       i i i i `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Richard Damon
31 Jan 25 i     i i       i i i `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1joes
28 Jan 25 i     i i       i i `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs4joes
28 Jan 25 i     i i       i i  `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs3WM
28 Jan 25 i     i i       i i   `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs2joes
28 Jan 25 i     i i       i i    `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1WM
31 Jan 25 i     i i       i `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs4joes
1 Feb 25 i     i i       i  `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs3WM
1 Feb 25 i     i i       i   +- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Richard Damon
1 Feb 25 i     i i       i   `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1joes
27 Jan 25 i     i i       +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs44joes
28 Jan 25 i     i i       `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs9Richard Damon
25 Jan 25 i     i `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs756Jim Burns
26 Jan 25 i     `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs7joes
26 Jan 25 `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs3Richard Damon

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal