Re: 2N=E

On 11/1/2024 6:13 AM, WM wrote:

On 31.10.2024 22:05, joes wrote:

Am Thu, 31 Oct 2024 19:30:00 +0100 schrieb WM:

On 31.10.2024 19:07, Jim Burns wrote:

A finite sequence of only
true.or.not.first.false 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝘀
holds a 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺 that,
 after all swaps, Bob is not in
 any visible or dark room which he has ever been in.

>
He is not elsewhere either.

>
He is nowhere.

>
My logic prohibits
a loss during lossless exchange,
even if repeated infinitely often.

Define
lossless i  :⇔
i.many exchanges must be lossless
Consider the set Lossless of the lossless
Lossless = {i: lossless i}
For each j ∈ Lossless:
⟨0,1,...,j-1,j,j+1⟩ ⊆ Lossless  and
the set Lossless is more.than.j.many  and
For each j ∈ Lossless:
the set Lossless is not that lossless j.many
However.many the set Lossless is,
that.many exchanges can be not.lossless.

In my theory I apply this logic.

'Infinite' does not mean what you want it to mean.