Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 16. Feb 2025, 13:34:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <e65f39b64ea4a5bb0fd1b8d214fbf99c4a5a0b23@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/16/25 5:39 AM, WM wrote:
On 15.02.2025 18:54, joes wrote:
No element of the set of FISONs is
necessary
Therefore all can be removed, and U(F) = ℕ ==> U(F\F) = ℕ.
Regards, WM
Which just proves there is no necesary set.
There never was a need for a necessary set, just as there are not always necessary conditions, if there are two or more alternate sets of conditions that allow something,
Something it seems you don't understand.
Maybe your Naive Mathematics can't get past one.