Sujet : Re: math, is it just physics?
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 29. Jan 2025, 11:46:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <ed39f7f86288385d55f75d99082d4fe54f766092@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Wed, 29 Jan 2025 09:48:47 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 28.01.2025 21:56, sobriquet wrote:
So in a way one could claim that concepts like integers and their
properties and relationships can be more or less empirically observed
in the behavior and properties of things like elementary particles such
as electrons or fields.
Or bricks, marbles, people etc. The natural numbers have been abstracted
from reality. The laws like "the existence of n implies the existence of
n+1" were so evident, that no axioms appeared necessary before Dedekind,
Peano, Schmidt etc. Only Cantor's assumption of an actual set with |ℕ|
being a fixed quantity greater than all numbers is not abstracted from
reality.
Oh PLEASE show me something physically infinite.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.
Date | Sujet | # | | Auteur |
28 Jan 25 | math, is it just physics? | 23 | | sobriquet |
28 Jan 25 |  Re: math, is it just physics? | 8 | | FromTheRafters |
29 Jan 25 |   Re: math, is it just physics? | 7 | | sobriquet |
29 Jan 25 |    Re: math, is it just physics? (just mathematics) | 6 | | Ross Finlayson |
29 Jan 25 |     Re: math, is it just physics? (just mathematics) | 5 | | sobriquet |
29 Jan 25 |      Re: math, is it just physics? (just mathematics) | 1 | | Ross Finlayson |
5 Feb 25 |      Re: math, is it just physics? (just mathematics) | 3 | | Stefan Ram |
5 Feb 25 |       Re: math, is it just physics? (just mathematics) | 2 | | sobriquet |
5 Feb 25 |        Re: math, is it just physics? (just mathematics) | 1 | | sobriquet |
29 Jan 25 |  Re: math, is it just physics? | 10 | | WM |
29 Jan 25 |   Re: math, is it just physics? | 9 | | joes |
29 Jan 25 |    Re: math, is it just physics? | 4 | | sobriquet |
5 Feb 25 |     Re: math, is it just physics? | 3 | | Stefan Ram |
5 Feb 25 |      Re: math, is it just physics? | 2 | | sobriquet |
6 Feb 25 |       Re: math, is it just physics? | 1 | | Stefan Ram |
29 Jan 25 |    Re: math, is it just physics? | 1 | | Jim Burns |
31 Jan 25 |    Re: math, is it just physics? | 3 | | Ross Finlayson |
31 Jan 25 |     Re: math, is it just physics? | 2 | | Ross Finlayson |
1 Feb 25 |      Re: math, is it just physics? (zero/infinity) | 1 | | Ross Finlayson |
5 Feb 25 |  Re: math, is it just physics? | 4 | | Stefan Ram |
5 Feb 25 |   The Paradox of Simulation (Was: math, is it just physics?) | 3 | | Mild Shock |
5 Feb 25 |    Re: The Paradox of Simulation (Was: math, is it just physics?) | 2 | | Mild Shock |
5 Feb 25 |     Re: The Paradox of Simulation (Was: math, is it just physics?) | 1 | | Mild Shock |