Sujet : Re: Does the number of nines increase?
De : james.g.burns (at) *nospam* att.net (Jim Burns)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 30. Jun 2024, 21:59:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <f12596bf-d3ba-4bc2-89d5-2a24fe11f903@att.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/27/2024 8:15 AM, WM wrote:
Le 26/06/2024 à 23:55, Jim Burns a écrit :
WM thinks an infiniteᵂᴹ number is
very.very.very.large.but.finiteⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ
>
No,
I assume that sets are complete.
I (JB) think that what you (WM) call 'logic' is that
each nonempty set has a trichotomous order such that
each nonempty subset holds a first and a last,
whether its first or last is visibleᵂᴹ or darkᵂᴹ
Is that what you're saying?
Therefore ℕ_0 as a proper superset of ℕ has
one elements more than ℕ.
Infinity does not make them equal.